Zahlreiche Veröffentlichungen sind auch zum Download verfügbar: http://ssrn.com/author=1005596.

Art der Publikation: Beitrag in Zeitschrift

Time-Consistent Risk-Averse Dynamic Pricing

Autor(en):
Schur, R.; Gönsch, J.; Hassler, M.
Titel der Zeitschrift:
European Journal of Operational Research
Jahrgang (Veröffentlichung):
277 (2019)
Heftnummer:
2
Seiten:
587-603
Schlagworte:
Revenue management; Dynamic pricing; Risk aversion; Conditional value-at-risk
Datei:
Time-Consistent Risk-Averse Dynamic Pricing (2,35 MB)
Link zum Volltext:
doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.038
Zitation:
Download BibTeX

Kurzfassung

Many industries use dynamic pricing on an operational level to maximize revenue from selling a fixed capacity over a finite horizon. Classical risk-neutral approaches do not accommodate the risk aversion often encountered in practice. When risk aversion is considered, time-consistency becomes an important issue. In this paper, we use a dynamic coherent risk-measure to ensure that decisions are actually implemented and only depend on states that may realize in the future. In particular, we use the risk measure Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), which recently became popular in areas like finance, energy or supply chain management.

A result is that the risk-averse dynamic pricing problem can be transformed to a classical, risk-neutral problem. To do so, a surprisingly simple modification of the selling probabilities suffices. Thus, all structural properties carry over. Moreover, we show that the risk-averse and the risk-neutral solution of the original problem are proportional under certain conditions, that is, their optimal decision variable and objective values are proportional, respectively. In a small numerical study, we evaluate the risk vs. revenue trade-off and compare the new approach with existing approaches from literature.

This has straightforward implications for practice. On the one hand, it shows that existing dynamic pricing algorithms and systems can be kept in place and easily incorporate risk aversion. On the other hand, our results help to understand many risk-averse decision makers who often use “conservative” estimates of selling probabilities or discount optimal prices.